Skip to main content

Paramount+ Review and Breakdown

 


Paramount+, the rebranded CBS All Access streaming service from ViacomCBS, launched today. It got me thinking about this photograph. Are you familiar with it? 


If you aren't, perhaps you're wondering why Tom Cruise is standing next to Charlton Heston who is standing next to Penny Marshall who is standing to Bob Hope who is standing next to Victor Mature who is standing next to
*squints* Elizabeth McGovern who is standing next to Robert De Niro. The whole photo is full of weird combinations like that - Shelley Long next to Jimmy Stewart, Molly Ringwald next to Dorothy Lamour, Gregory Peck next to Debra Winger. This photograph was taken in celebration of Paramount's 75th anniversary in 1987. But you're forgiven if you didn't guess that, because who looks at all these people and thinks immediately that what they all have in common was working for Paramount at one point? Certainly not I. 

And therein lies the problem with Paramount+'s marketing strategy. Paramount, unlike Disney, does not have the kind of unified brand identity that you need to get people to automatically recognize it. Except Paramount+ isn't even using illustrious and glamorous movie stars to market the new service, but rather what they've cynically termed "brands".  You've probably seen the terrible ads - Gayle King hanging out with RuPaul, Dora the Explorer, and a Klingon. Huh? What does that tell us about what this streaming service is and how it is different from the others?

When I ranked all the streaming services a couple of months ago, I listed many problems CBS All Access needed to address if it wanted to compete with Netflix and HBO Max. It has not taken my advice. Paramount+ is just CBS All Access with a new (worse) name. There have been no changes, let alone improvements, to the interface. If there's additional library content, I haven't noticed it. It's the most disappointing launch for a new service because it's not a new service. 

I must ask: why rebrand now? I'd understand if they had some Mandalorian-level show that they could launch with. But they don't. (They do, however, have a new Spongebob movie and a reunion of the cast of the first season of The Real World, if you're young enough to enjoy the former or old enough to enjoy the latter). Last week, the execs behind the service announced a slew of shows in development, including a reboot of Frasier and a bunch of shows based on Paramount movies. They also announced that linear channels a la Pluto will be coming to the service at some point (Remember, after ViacomCBS bought Pluto, they put Pluto's Tom Ryan in charge of all their streamers). But why didn't they wait until they had these selling points to launch this rebranding? There is no reason anyone who wasn't interested in CBS All Access would be interested in Paramount+ as it is now.

You'd have difficulty locating movies with just about any of these golden age stars from the 75th anniversary photos. Paramount's classic film library isn't being utilized at all. Also, they don't even have all of the Star Trek movies! How can they market themselves as the streaming home for the Star Trek universe when Hulu has just as many Star Trek shows and movies? It speaks to ViacomCBS's larger strategy, which is to get money where it can by making licensing deals with other streamers. They sold the streaming rights to Yellowstone to rival Peacock, which is why you won't find that hit show on Paramount+. That's a fine strategy, but they can't do that and also want a highly competitive streamer of their own. Streaming services need exclusive content to be competitive, both original and library. The fact that ViacomCBS hasn't equipped Paramount+ with significant amounts of either is laughable. 

It's obvious that ViacomCBS isn't willing to write the kind of checks that Paramount+ would need to compete with Netflix in terms of producing new content. But why can't they spruce up the interface, or at least give us a watchlist? I mean, why even bother changing the name at all? They would have been better off focusing on growing the free, ad-supported Pluto and keeping CBS All Access' appeal niche. But, they went with Paramount+ instead. Let's see how this works out for them.

If you would like to see me talking some more about Paramount+, subscribe to my brand new YouTube channel!



Comments

  1. Your blog took to me an entirely significant spot. It is a beneficial and factual article to enhance knowledge. Thanks for sharing an article like this.dazn free trial

    ReplyDelete
  2. The further thrill comes from ready to|with the ability to|having the ability to} make neighbor bets you could modify to incorporate a lot as} 9 numbers on each side of your primary guess. 메리트카지노 Black & Yellow Roulette at PartyCasino a shot — you might not need to play roulette some other method after this. Pala Casino’s Roulette Advanced should be proper up your alley. You can place your bets instantly on the recent or cold numbers, and might also|you can even} make your commonplace neighbor bets. French Roulette from Harrah’s is another gorgeously laid out game, making the entire approach uncluttered and streamlined to provide the best consideration to} what’s taking place.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Leave a comment!

Popular posts from this blog

Must See TV? A Look Back on September 16, 1993 featuring Seinfeld, Frasier, and More

What do you think about when autumn rolls along? Falling leaves, perhaps? Apple picking? If you’re anything like me, it’s new TV shows. When I was growing up in the ‘00s and early ‘10s, I would pore over the fall schedules of each of the networks and get excited by the new series premiering and my favorites returning. This was before the streaming wars ruined television. Before Hollywood was overrun by tech. It wasn’t actually all that long ago, but it feels distant and irretrievable. I was so much younger then.  Fueled by that feeling of nostalgia that returns every September, I felt it’d be worth my time to revisit TV’s past, back through the years to before my era. I decided to recreate the programming on NBC on September 16, 1993 - the first Thursday night of the 1993-94 season, which was the one that introduced the famous “Must See TV” branding. I hope using the lens of one specific night of programming will be a useful and unique way to think about these shows, which have bee...

Ranking the Films of Sofia Coppola

Ranking the Films of Sofia Coppola   Sofia Coppola may be the daughter of one of the most acclaimed directors of all time, but she has never struggled to imbue her films with her unique vision. A trademark of Coppola's films is that all of her films deal with the theme of celebrity, whether it be local celebrity, fading celebrity, unsought celebrity, the monotony that goes along with celebrity, or the unattainability of celebrity. Other trademarks of a Sofia Coppola film are dreamlike visuals and awesome soundtracks. This is how I'd rank the films of Sofia Coppola:

Film Review: Sully

Film Review: Sully  Sully , the latest film by Clint Eastwood, stars Tom Hanks as Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, the guy who landed a plane on the Hudson River in January of 2009. The film is about that landing and the subsequent investigation about whether Sully made the right call. While it doesn't quite reach the heights of Eastwood's best work, Sully is a gripping drama about what it means to be good at your job.